sSMC derived from unknown acrocentric chromosome
|
Cases with neocentromeres |
2 |
Here not all available older SMC-cases identified in the pre-FISH era are included!
| In general 70% of sSMC carriers are clinically normal. The figures here are based partially on the bias, that mainly clinically aberrant cases are reported in literature! |
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Cases without clinical findings (O):
|
case no. |
gender |
age at diagnosis |
studied |
de novo/ |
GTG-banding result |
final FISH result of the sSMC |
FISH |
UPD |
clinical symptoms |
reference |
|
acro- O-1 |
male | 39y | PBL | n.a. | 47,XY,+mar (bisatellited) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | five consecutive spontaneous abortions of partner and no live born children | {1} case 1 |
|
acro- O-2 |
male | 31y | PBL | familial (3 generations) |
47,XY,+mar (bisatellited) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9 years of infertility in partnership before first child | {1} case 2 |
|
acro- O-3 |
female | 27y | PBL | n.a. | 47,XX,+mar (metacentric) | rev ish. acrop++ | midi | n.a. | normal woman - a child was lost a week 16 due to a karyotype 46,X,+mar | {8} case 2 |
|
acro- O-4 |
moved to acro-N-mar/2 | |||||||||
|
acro- O-5 |
male | 29y | PBL | n.a. | 47,XY,+mar (metacentric)[25%]/ 46,XY[75%] |
inv dup (acro)(p10) | cenM, M-FISH, acro-cenM | n.a. | normal phenotype and no children in connection with OAT III syndrome | {9} case 111 |
|
acro- O-6 |
male | 23y | PBL | n.a. | 47,XY,+mar (metacentric)[80%]/ 46,XY[25%] |
inv dup (acro)(p10)* | M-FISH | n.a. | normal phenotype with fertility problems and azoospermia | {10} |
|
acro- O-7 |
n.a. | pranatal | AF | maternal | 47,+mar [?%] | inv dup (acro)(p10)* | n.a. | n.a. | normal phenotype in mother, child normal in sonography | {11} |
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Cases with unclear/insufficient characterization of the sSMC itself (C):
|
case no. |
gender |
age at diagnosis |
studied |
de novo/ |
GTG-banding result |
final FISH result of the sSMC |
FISH |
UPD |
clinical symptoms |
reference |
|
acro- C-1 to acro- C-5 |
various |
prenatal |
AF | familial or de novo | 47,+mar | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none or n.a. | {2} |
|
acro- C-6 to acro- C-15 |
various |
prenatal or postnatal |
AF or PBL | familial or de novo | 47,+mar | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none or n.a. | {3} |
|
acro- C-16 to acro- C-79 |
various |
prenatal or postnatal |
AF or PBL | familial or de novo | 47,+mar | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none or n.a. | review of literature before 1983 {3} |
|
acro- C-80 |
various |
postnatal |
PBL | familial | 47,+mar (#15 was excluded) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none or n.a. | {4} |
|
acro- C-81 to acro- C-111 |
various |
prenatal and postnatal |
AF and PBL | familial or de novo | 47,+mar | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none or n.a. | {5} |
|
acro- C-111 to acro- C-118 |
various |
prenatal and postnatal |
AF and PBL | familial or de novo | 47,+mar | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none or n.a. | {6} |
|
acro- C119 |
female | n.a. | PBL | familial | 47,XX,+mar | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | none in family; index case with Sturge-Weber syndrome | {7} |
Cases with an sSMC with neo-centromere (N):
|
case no. |
gender |
age at diagnosis |
studied |
de novo/ |
GTG-banding result |
final FISH result of the sSMC |
FISH |
UPD |
clinical symptoms |
reference |
| acro-N-mar/1 | male |
27y |
PBL | de novo | 47,XY,+mar[100%] | neo inv dup (acro)(p11) | acro cenM; CENPB and CENP C | n.a. | see below | {0} case provided by Dr. Polityko, Minsk, Belarus |
|
normal phenotype - fertility problems |
||||||||||
| acro-N-mar/2 | male |
40y |
PBL | n.a. | 47,XY,+mar (metacentric)[39]/ 46,XY[11] |
neo inv dup (acro)(p11) | acro-cenM; midi; acro cenM; CENPB and CENP C | n.a. | see below | {9} case 110 |
|
normal man; planed ICSI |
||||||||||
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Martin RH, Hildebrand KA, Yamamoto J, Peterson D, Rademaker AW, Taylor P, Lin
CC.
The meiotic segregation of human sperm chromosomes in two men with
accessory marker chromosomes.
Am J Med Genet. 1986 Oct;25(2):381-388.
Benn PA, Hsu LY.
Incidence and significance of supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal
diagnosis.
Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Sep;36(5):1092-1102.
Steinbach P, Djalali M, Hansmann I, Kattner E, Meisel-Stosiek M, Probeck HD,
Schmidt A, Wolf M.
The genetic significance of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes.
Hum Genet. 1983;65(2):155-164.
Bartsch HD, de Azevedo Moreira LM, Rohrborn G, Claussen U, Gebauer HJ.
Possible origin of a small bisatellited additional chromosome.
Hum Genet. 1980;54(3):319-322.
Buckton KE, Spowart G, Newton MS, Evans HJ.
Forty four probands with an additional "marker" chromosome.
Hum Genet. 1985;69(4):353-730.
Abbo G, Zellweger H.
The syndrome of the metacentric microchromosome.
Helv Paediatr Acta. 1970 Jan;25(1):83-94.
de Gutierrez AC, Salamanca F, Lisker R, Segovia A.
Supernumerary bisatellited
chromosome in a family ascertained through a patient with Sturge-Weber
syndrome.
Ann Genet. 1975 Mar;18(1):45-49.
Thangavelu M, Pergament E, Espinosa R 3rd, Bohlander SK.
Characterization of marker chromosomes by microdissection and fluorescence in
situ hybridization.
Prenat Diagn. 1994 Jul;14(7):583-588.
Manvelyan M, Riegel M, Santos M, Fuster C, Pellestor F, Mazauric ML, Schulze
B, Polityko A, Tittelbach H, Reising-Ackermann G, Belitz B, Hehr U, Kelbova C,
Volleth M, Gödde E, Anderson J, Küpferling P, Köhler S, Duba HC, Dufke A,
Aktas D, Martin T, Schreyer I, Ewers E, Reich D, Mrasek K, Weise A, Liehr T.
32 new cases with small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) detected in
connection with fertility problems - detailed molecular cytogenetic
characterization and review of the literature.
Int J Mol Med 2008, 21(6):705-714.